Made available UCL Week 10, 3 Nov 2023.
Due 17 November 2023, 13:00 London time.
You are to work by yourself.
This ICA consists of 5 questions, worth 35 points;
This ICA is worth 30 percent of your grade for this module.
Some parts of the questions will require you to write and run R/Python code.
The ICA must be completed in R Markdown/Quarto/Juptyer Notebook and typeset using Markdown with Latex code, just like the way our module content is generated. You can choose to use either R or Python.
As usual, part of the grading will depend on the clarity and presentation of your solutions.
You are to do this assignment by yourself, without any help from others.
You are allowed to use any materials and code that was presented so far.
Do not search the internet for answers to the ICA.
Do not use ChatGPT or similar AI type assistance.
Do not use any fancy code or packages imported from elsewhere.
Conduct yourselves honorably.
Please familarize yourself with the following excerpt on plagiarism and collusion from the student handbook
By ticking the submission declaration box in Moodle you are agreeing to the following declaration:
Declaration: I am aware of the UCL Statistical Science Department’s regulations on plagiarism for assessed coursework. I have read the guidelines in the student handbook and understand what constitutes plagiarism. I hereby affirm that the work I am submitting for this in-course assessment is entirely my own.
Please do not write your name anywhere on the submission. Please include only your student number as the proxy identifier.
The number of arrivals to boutique shop each day can be modeled with a Poisson random variable with mean \(\lambda >0\), which we hope to estimate. We are given a data set \(x_1, \ldots, x_{300}\), but we know that the owner has cooked the books, and will falsify the data so that \(x_i \not = 0\); specifically, they will record a entry of \(1\), whenever no customers arrived, but will faithfully enter records otherwise.
Consider the region \(R\) bounded by the \(x\)-axis and the function \(f(x) = \tfrac{3}{2}(1 -x^2)\), for \(x \in [0,1]\).
An inexperienced gambler starts with blackjack, betting five pounds, so only wins (5 pounds) with probability \(0.43\); if they win, they bet again, and if they lose, they switch to roulette, where they always bet (1 pound) on \(0\), so that they have a \(1/(36+1)\) chance of winning (35 pounds); again they switch back to blackjack if they lose, and stay on roulette if they win.
Consider a Poisson point process on the real line of unit intensity, which we think of as dust. We start at the origin, and are interested in vacuuming, and we do it in a greedy way, so that we always go to the closest piece of dust. For background (not necessary for the completion nor understanding of this question) see: On the greedy random walk.
Let \(\epsilon >0\). Suppose that \(X\) is a Poisson random variable of mean \(\lambda >0\), and \(Y_{\epsilon}\) is a Poisson random variable of mean \(\lambda + \epsilon\). Use the power of coupling to upper bound the total variational distance of \(X\) and \(Y\) as a function of \(\epsilon\), and show that the distance converges to zero, as \(\epsilon \to 0\).
Q5 is an old-school maths-type exercise, with no coding.
Q4: this is a Poisson point process on the entire real line \(\mathbb{R}=(-\infty, \infty)\), which can be constructed by joining two independent Poisson point processes on the half line \([0, \infty)\), at the origin.
Q1: If necessary, you are free to use numerical solvers in R; that is, you do not need to code Newton’s method yourself, but you are welcome to.
I will create a submission portal on Moodle soon.
Version: 11 November 2023