This assessment is classified as Coursework as defined in UCL’s Student Policies for Exams and Assessments. It contributes 30% to the overall mark for this module.
The release date for this assessment 12 Dec 2025.
The submission deadline is 13:00 (UK time) on 6 Feb 2026
Individual extensions to the submission deadline can only be granted where a student has been provided Reasonable Academic Adjustments or has made a valid claim for Extenuating Circumstances. The standard extension length for this assessment type is 5 working days.
In preparation for this assessment, please ensure that you are familiar with the Department of Statistical Science’s guidance on academic integrity. When submitting your work, you will be required to make a declaration that you have read and understood this guidance.
Parts of your submission may be scanned using similarity detection software. If any breach of the assessment regulations is suspected, it will be investigated in accordance with UCL’s Student Academic Misconduct Procedure.
To facilitate anonymous marking, you should not write your name anywhere on your work, including in file names or file descriptions requested as part of the submission process.
You must only submit your work via the designated portal in Moodle. If you try to submit via email or any other channel this will not count as a submission and will not be marked.
There are strict, non-negotiable penalties for late submission, which for coursework are as follows.
– Up to 2 working days late: deduction of 10 percentage points, but no lower than the pass mark.
– 2-5 working days late: capped at the pass mark.
– More than 5 working days late: mark of 1.00%.
If the module lead becomes aware of a significant technical issue or outage affecting Moodle during the assessment, a message will be circulated to explain what has happened and the steps being taken to mitigate the issue. If you do not receive notification of a more widespread issue and you experience technical difficulties, you should refer to the Help & Support resources provided by UCL’s central IT service. However, last-minute technical issues will not be considered as valid grounds for missing the deadline, so ensure that you leave plenty of time to prepare, upload and check your submission.
Non-submission (in the absence of any valid Extenuating Circumstances) will mean that your mark for this component is recorded as 0.00% and you will be deemed to have made an attempt.
You should expect to receive feedback on this assessment within 20 working days of the submission deadline. For this ICA, most likely, you will have to wait until the new year for it to be graded. In the event of a delay, the module lead will contact students directly with details of the revised timeline.
© (2025) UCL. This assessment paper is the intellectual property of UCL and subject to copyright. It must not be reproduced or shared with any third party without prior permission of UCL.
This ICA is group work.
To facilitate anonymous marking, you should not write your name anywhere on your work, including in file names or file descriptions requested as part of the submission process.
This ICA consists of 5 questions, worth 56 points.
Some parts of the questions will require you to write and run R/Python code.
The ICA must be completed in R Markdown/Quarto/Juptyer Notebook and typeset using Markdown with Latex code, just like the way our module content is generated. You can choose to use either R or Python.
As usual, part of the grading will depend on the clarity and presentation of your solutions.
You are to do this assignment by yourselves, in your group, without any help from others.
You are allowed to use any materials and code that was presented so far.
Do not search the internet for answers to the ICA.
Do not use ChatGPT or similar AI type assistance.
Do not use any fancy code or packages imported from elsewhere.
Conduct yourselves honorably.
Please do not write your name anywhere on the submission. You may include your student number as a backup identifier, but this is not necessary.
As this is a group project, collusion and academic misconduct cases will apply to all members in the group. All group members bear full responsibility. If a student suspects any potential misconduct cases from other groupmates, they should inform me immediately.
Please familarize yourself with UCL’s guidance on academic integrity and plagiarism and collusion
By ticking the submission declaration box in Moodle you are agreeing to the following declaration:
Declaration: I have read the Department of Statistical Science’s guidance on academic integrity and understand what constitutes academic misconduct. I hereby affirm that the work I am submitting for this assessment is entirely my own, except where indicated by referencing.
You are given \(\Gamma\)–a Poisson point process of intensity \(3\) on the interval \([0, \pi]\). Consider the function \(g(t) = \sin(t) +2\) and the following thinning procedure to produce another point process \(\Gamma'\). Suppose the points of \(\Gamma\) are given by \(\{t_1, \ldots, t_n\}\). We consider independent \(\mathrm{Bern}(p_i)\) random variables, \(X_1, \ldots, X_n\), with \[p_i = g(t_i)/3.\] We let \(\Gamma' \subseteq \Gamma\), where \(t_i\) is a point of \(\Gamma'\) if and only if \(X_i =1\). Let \(M(t) = \Gamma'[0,t)\) be the number of points of \(\Gamma'\) in the interval \([0, t)\).
Suppose items arrive at an exponential rate \(\lambda\) to a queue with two independent servers, each of which serve at the same rate \(\mu > \lambda\). Items will go to the first available server and if both servers are available, we can designate one to be the default choice; this is known as a \(M/M/2\) queue.
Consider a Poisson arrival process on \([0, \infty)\) of intensity \(\lambda\). Suppose we colour the first arrival blue, and then next arrival red, and continue colouring the points in this alternating fashion. Consider the arrival process formed by considering only the red points. Let \(N(t)\) be the number of arrivals by time \(t >0\).
Consider a queue with exponential arrival rate \(\lambda =1\) and exponential service rate \(\mu=2\); this would be a \(M/M/1\) first come first serve queue, except for the following proviso. Suppose that each item is independently assigned a colour red or blue, with probability \(3/4\) and \(1/4\), respectively. The red points get priority over the blue item in the line up; in particular, if there is one blue item being served and there is one blue item waiting to be served and a red item arrives, the red item moves ahead of the blue item and will be served next. Argue that the blue items do eventually get served in finite time.